Comment 3 for bug 421371
Revision history for this message
| Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote Re: [Bug 421371] [NEW] timestamp mismatch of fs superblock at file system check | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
status incomplete
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 10:42 +0000, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
> seen with current karmic 20090830, this is an upgraded system. when a
> fsck of the root file system is required, I get a message "fsck
> required, timestamp of fs superblock is in the future", and a fsck -y
> <rootfs> is needed as a manual action. Looking at the timestamps (now,
> and for the superblock, it's a difference of 2h - a few seconds). The
> local timezone is +2, so I assume that this is a problem with
> timestamps. Didn't investigate further.
>
Please supply the exact output of fsck, including the timestamps (it
should display both).
Also at this prompt please run "/sbin/hwclock --debug --show", "date"
and "cat /etc/default/rcS"
Has this machine previously had Windows installed? Did you verify that
the Hardware Clock was correct at the time you installed?
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>