Fabio, actually don't worry about getting another backtrace, it looks like the information gathered so far is sufficient, it's just in assembler code I don't quite follow. I think the next step is for this bug to go upstream.
Fabio, actually don't worry about getting another backtrace, it looks like the information gathered so far is sufficient, it's just in assembler code I don't quite follow. I think the next step is for this bug to go upstream.