Comment 156 for bug 1098489

Revision history for this message
In , Zdenek Kabelac (zdenek-kabelac) wrote :

Well here is just another one -

$ ./basic-copyarea
Opened connection to :0 for testing.
Testing setting of single pixels (root): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area sets (root): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area fills (root, using pixmap source): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area fills (root, using window source): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing setting of single pixels (child): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area sets (child): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area fills (child, using pixmap source): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area fills (child, using window source): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing setting of single pixels (pixmap): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area sets (pixmap): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing area fills (pixmap, using pixmap source): passed [1 iterations x 4096]
Testing setting of single pixels (root): passed [2 iterations x 2048]
Testing area sets (root): failed to set pixel (0,0) to 0072dc99 [0e72dc99], found 00000000 [00000000] instead
00000000 00000000 00000000 0e72dc99 0e72dc99 0e72dc99
5146daef 5146daef 5146daef 0e72dc99 0e72dc99 0e72dc99
5146daef 5146daef 5146daef 0e72dc99 0e72dc99 0e72dc99

Unsure if it's related to anything and test seems to be lenghty -
but there seems to be some observable pattern.

Anyway - could I help here with testing some patch - or do you get same errors yourself on your available hardware ?