Ubuntu
xulrunner package

  1. Bug #182519
  2. Comment #18

Comment 18 for bug 182519

Revision history for this message
In , Alexander Sack (asac) wrote :

(In reply to comment #15)
> Maybe we should have a separate contractid for the "implements both
> nsIPromptService and nsIPromptService2" contract... Though it's not really
> possible to map the nsIPromptService2 methods into nsIPromptService methods, is
> it?
>

... we could add another layer of adaption here for sure. I just wonder if there is really a reason to do so? Isn't this toolkit code the only place where we need to provide this particular kind of backward compatibility? If so, i don't think its really bad to just add this code here for now.