Comment 5 for bug 1964992

Hey Heitor! Thank you for following up on Robie's questions. As this is a bug in the current upstream versions of zfs-linux + currently LTS upgrades to jammy are enabled, I'm starting to lean towards getting this accepted into focal-proposed. Out of curiosity, what is the situation on bionic btw.? What is the behavior there?

Too bad there's simply no way of knowing how many people would be potentially affected by the inversion of the behavior. Did we see any reports of this being a problem on jammy, after we switched upgrades from focal? The thing is that, potentially, some might want to stay of focal to not have to deal with incompatibilities like that after upgrades. So we need to be considerate of such people. Although I do agree the reducing of ZFS memory footprint being much more common.