Copyright for jcdf source package in Jammy

Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: JCDF
Upstream-Contact: Mark Taylor 
Source: https://github.com/mbtaylor/jcdf
Files-Excluded: data/*.cdf nasa/*

Files: *
Copyright: 2013 Mark Taylor
 2017 Ole Streicher  (Debian files)
License: LGPL-3

Files: BitExpandInputStream.java
Copyright: 2013 Mark Taylor
 1992 Mark Nelson
License: LGPL-3 and code-use-policy

License: LGPL-3
 On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU Lesser General Public
 License version 3 can be found in the file
 `/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-3'.

License: code-use-policy
 When I write a book or magazine article, I almost always include some
 illustrative code. This gives my readers a starting point for their
 own work. I’ve often been frustrated trying to reproduce someone’s
 ideas without working code, so I try hard to make sure my programs
 compile and work properly.
 .
 To a book or magazine publisher, source code is just another kind of
 text. And in their world, that means it must be copyrighted. The idea
 of giving words away pains them deeply. So they publish the code
 using virtually the same copyright they use for everything else. That
 copyright gives you, the buyer, the right to read the book and not
 much else! This is of course, foolish.
 .
 The Real World
 .
 On a regular basis, readers ask if it’s okay for them to use the code
 from one of my books or articles. They read the copyright notices and
 get a little nervous. Or even worse, their managers get a little
 nervous! Here is what I tell them:
 .
  * It is my intention that anyone who buys the book or magazine be
    free to use the source code in any form they please. I only request
    that any use that involves public reproduction include proper
    attribution.
  * I assert that in no case will I initiate or cooperate with any
    attempt to enforce the copyright on the source code, whether it
    belongs to me or a publisher.
  * The code I publish is written for clarity, not efficiency. Once
    you massage the code to work with your product, it is likely to be
    significantly different from the published code anyway.
  * Nobody from any of the companies that publish my work is even
    remotely interested in pursuing people for unauthorized use of source
    code. They don’t have anyone on their staffs to deal with problems
    like this, and they probably don’t even want to think about it.
  * What the publishers are concerned about is you writing books or
    articles that copy their stuff. Don’t do that, and you can be certain
    that they will be happy.
  * None of the code I publish is warranted in any way by me or the
    publisher to be free of defects. If you need bullet-proof software
    that is guaranteed to work as promised you will need to adopt a
    methodology considerably more rigid than that of simply purchasing a
    book or magazine.
Remark: The file contains a short form of this statement, the full
 version is taken from http://marknelson.us/code-use-policy/
 There was a short discussion on this on debian-legal, where Ian
 Jackson pointed out that the license is probably OK for us.
 https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2017/04/msg00004.html