You are completely right. This is indeed a bug - as it is an assert, it's not that problematic, should be fixed anyway.
Good that I know the guy who wrote that part of te code ;) ... he told me that it was meant to be a && ;)
I will take care of the fix.
Thanks for finding this bug Hans Joachim :)
You are completely right. This is indeed a bug - as it is an assert, it's not that problematic, should be fixed anyway.
Good that I know the guy who wrote that part of te code ;) ... he told me that it was meant to be a && ;)
I will take care of the fix.
Thanks for finding this bug Hans Joachim :)