geis_subscription_deactivate() always fails
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Geis |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Daniel d'Andrada | ||
geis (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Precise |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Francis Ginther |
Bug Description
We need this fix backported from Quantal as it's in the code that was changed to the new naming scheme, from utouch-geis to just geis, that must be done in Precise as well.
[Original bug description]
geis_subscripti
[Test Case]
Just call geis_subscripti
[Regression Potential]
I would say it's irrelevant as the fix is a one-liner. It just make the function return the correct status instead of a hardcoded GEIS_STATUS_
Related branches
- Chase Douglas (community): Approve
-
Diff: 107 lines (+81/-0)3 files modifiedlibutouch-geis/backend/grail/geis_grail_backend.c (+2/-0)
testsuite/geis2/Makefile.am (+1/-0)
testsuite/geis2/gtest_gbe_deactivate_sub.cpp (+78/-0)
Changed in utouch-geis: | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
assignee: | nobody → Daniel d'Andrada (dandrader) |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in utouch-geis: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
Changed in utouch-geis: | |
milestone: | none → 2.1.11 |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
affects: | utouch-geis (Ubuntu) → geis (Ubuntu) |
Changed in geis (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in geis (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
assignee: | nobody → Francis Ginther (fginther) |
description: | updated |
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted geis into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http:// launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ geis/2. 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Testing/ EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not, change the tag to verification- failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/QATeam/ PerformingSRUVe rification . Thank you in advance!