Possibly not suitable for Sarge

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #282857 http://bugs.debian.org/282857

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:20:11 +0100
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: Possibly not suitable for Sarge

Package: ldp-docbook-stylesheets
Severity: serious

The maintainer of this package has expressed doubts about the
suitability of this package for inclusion in Sarge:

- is it still functional?
- does it comply to the current Debian XML standards?
- XML catalog support correct?
- more?

And feels that the package should not be shipped with Sarge unless
somebody verifies that this package is indeed suitable for release.

Hence this bug, please close it if you've verified this package is
suitable.

--Jeroen

--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
<email address hidden>
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

Fake bug for Debian release managment purposes

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 03:22:12 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#282857: Possibly not suitable for Sarge

tags 282857 patch
thanks

I made an attempt to save this package from removal. A patch is
difficult to provide since it includes allmost the whole package
due to the many policy and upstream changes.

However, the packages are available at
deb http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian ./
deb-src http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian ./

They are currently labeled as a NMU but of course one can change that
easily. I would even offer to (co-)maintain this package. As one of the
doc-linux maintainer it is kind of my business, too.

On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 12:20:11AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> The maintainer of this package has expressed doubts about the
> suitability of this package for inclusion in Sarge:
>
> - is it still functional?

Now, yes.

> - does it comply to the current Debian XML standards?

Now, yes.

> - XML catalog support correct?

I'm a bit confused about this one. I found no hint in the documentation
or in existing packages that I can use a catalog to register stylesheets
only (without DTD). Comments welcome.

> - more?

Documentation needed updates, done that as good as I could.

> And feels that the package should not be shipped with Sarge unless
> somebody verifies that this package is indeed suitable for release.
>
> Hence this bug, please close it if you've verified this package is
> suitable.

Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:32:52 -0500
From: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
Subject: Fixed in NMU of ldp-docbook-stylesheets 0.0.20040321-0.1

tag 143309 + fixed
tag 162204 + fixed
tag 282857 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 00:29:56 +0100
Source: ldp-docbook-stylesheets
Binary: ldp-docbook-dsssl ldp-docbook-xsl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.20040321-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
Description:
 ldp-docbook-dsssl - The Linux Documentation Project's DSSSL stylesheets
 ldp-docbook-xsl - The Linux Documentation Project's XSL stylesheets
Closes: 143309 162204 282857
Changes:
 ldp-docbook-stylesheets (0.0.20040321-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload that hopefully
     closes: #282857 "Possibly not suitable for Sarge"
   * New upstream release (Closes: #162204)
   * Adapt to current SGML/XML policy
     - Include compatibility symlink
   * Update LDP links in documentation (Closes: #143309)
   * Use dh_install for installing the files
   * add doc-base file for ldp-docbook-xsl
Files:
 beaadb602db4613e646b9a763e924a3e 666 text optional ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-0.1.dsc
 fcdcaaa3681f50726cd09c04aa487b97 27458 text optional ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321.orig.tar.gz
 a8a0230bbb0075a1309ab8ce1b213d1a 10093 text optional ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-0.1.diff.gz
 4def5bc1008db2b1b08c64a931f41adb 5776 text optional ldp-docbook-dsssl_0.0.20040321-0.1_all.deb
 13344b78990e7664b6e6b3dc6a16bef7 29044 text optional ldp-docbook-xsl_0.0.20040321-0.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBxycxQbn06FtxPfARAuk8AKDPJhCKi9KEmVKbXfqD68m6fztauACgpbho
ObdfDcC4lPXaxffuMpFsWy8=
=YkHq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:22:24 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: LDP docbook-depending packages

Hi,

I've just noticed that LDP docbook stylesheets have been
massively redone.

There are two points:

 symlinks aren't going to be installed by dpkg if it's been a directory before
   (i.e. your compatibility symlinks aren't installed when upgraded,
  it needs to be done in postinst)

 filenames are dramatically different.
  Thus, I have to rewrite my xsl stylesheets for
   wysihtml
   pbuilder
   update-cluster
   whatever else.
   -- is there anything else that is affected by this change?

regards,
 junichi

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:09:17 -0500
From: Mark Johnson <email address hidden>
To: Junichi Uekawa <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: LDP docbook-depending packages

Hi Junichi,

Thanks for the heads-up on this. I also need to update
docbook-stylesheets in the next couple of days, so I will get a
chance to look into this in some detail.

Wish I could offer more, but I'm not currently on a debian machine...

'Sounds like we may need to poke the upstream maintainer (which I'll
do) to see what the long-term plan is for the ldp-stylesheets. It'd
be nice to minimize the changes we need to make for the
ldp-stylesheets to work properly on Debian.

Wednesday I'll post what I've learned.

Cheers,
Mark

To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,

Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I've just noticed that LDP docbook stylesheets have been
> massively redone.
>
> There are two points:
>
> symlinks aren't going to be installed by dpkg if it's been a directory before
> (i.e. your compatibility symlinks aren't installed when upgraded,
> it needs to be done in postinst)
>
> filenames are dramatically different.
> Thus, I have to rewrite my xsl stylesheets for
> wysihtml
> pbuilder
> update-cluster
> whatever else.
> -- is there anything else that is affected by this change?
>
>
> regards,
> junichi
>
>

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:36:51 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
To: Junichi Uekawa <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: LDP docbook-depending packages

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:22:24PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I've just noticed that LDP docbook stylesheets have been
> massively redone.
>
> There are two points:
>
> symlinks aren't going to be installed by dpkg if it's been a directory before
> (i.e. your compatibility symlinks aren't installed when upgraded,
> it needs to be done in postinst)

As it was my NMU that broke this I will try to prepare a fixed package
later today.

Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:01:36 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <email address hidden>
To: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
Cc: Junichi Uekawa <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: LDP docbook-depending packages

Hi,

> >
> > There are two points:
> >
> > symlinks aren't going to be installed by dpkg if it's been a directory before
> > (i.e. your compatibility symlinks aren't installed when upgraded,
> > it needs to be done in postinst)
>
> As it was my NMU that broke this I will try to prepare a fixed package
> later today.

Files under
 /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/ldp
do not match what existed under
 /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/ldp

Thus, the individual files need to be symlinked.

I think ldp-html.xsl = tldp-one-page.xsl,
but I'm not quite sure about other xsl.

Used to be:
esheet/xsl/ldp/
-rw-r--r-- root/root 1075 2002-04-05 06:20:05 ./usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/ldp/ldp-html-chunk.xsl
-rw-r--r-- root/root 9032 2002-04-05 06:20:05 ./usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/ldp/ldp-html-common.xsl
-rw-r--r-- root/root 1072 2002-04-05 06:20:05 ./usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/ldp/ldp-html.xsl
-rw-r--r-- root/root 696 2002-04-05 06:20:05 ./usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/ldp/ldp-print.xsl

Is now:
-rw-r--r-- root/root 498 2004-12-12 11:04:06 ./usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/ldp/html/tldp-chapters.xsl
-rw-r--r-- root/root 987 2004-03-21 13:55:54 ./usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/ldp/html/tldp-common.xsl
-rw-r--r-- root/root 370 2004-12-12 11:04:06 ./usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/ldp/html/tldp-one-page.xsl
-rw-r--r-- root/root 871 2004-12-12 11:04:06 ./usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/ldp/html/tldp-sections.xsl

regards,
 junichi

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:02:13 -0500
From: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#282857: fixed in ldp-docbook-stylesheets 0.0.20040321-1

Source: ldp-docbook-stylesheets
Source-Version: 0.0.20040321-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ldp-docbook-stylesheets, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ldp-docbook-dsssl_0.0.20040321-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/ldp-docbook-stylesheets/ldp-docbook-dsssl_0.0.20040321-1_all.deb
ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/ldp-docbook-stylesheets/ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-1.diff.gz
ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/ldp-docbook-stylesheets/ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-1.dsc
ldp-docbook-xsl_0.0.20040321-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/ldp-docbook-stylesheets/ldp-docbook-xsl_0.0.20040321-1_all.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden> (supplier of updated ldp-docbook-stylesheets package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:01:57 +0100
Source: ldp-docbook-stylesheets
Binary: ldp-docbook-dsssl ldp-docbook-xsl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.20040321-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
Description:
 ldp-docbook-dsssl - The Linux Documentation Project's DSSSL stylesheets
 ldp-docbook-xsl - The Linux Documentation Project's XSL stylesheets
Closes: 143309 162204 282857 288364
Changes:
 ldp-docbook-stylesheets (0.0.20040321-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Package is orphaned now, change maintainer to
     QA Group
     Acknowledge NMU (Closes: #282857, #162204, #143309)
   * Fix creation of compatibility symlinks (Closes: #288364)
Files:
 654b54897907a845870edd9b962f2a54 670 text optional ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-1.dsc
 db5768dba3ac3657c150a75edcad20d6 10338 text optional ldp-docbook-stylesheets_0.0.20040321-1.diff.gz
 ff1b595bd9c6b9f1c17d0da08df2a855 5906 text optional ldp-docbook-dsssl_0.0.20040321-1_all.deb
 e4d00ef751aeec1a870ef4b64bbc703f 29370 text optional ldp-docbook-xsl_0.0.20040321-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB3ezWQbn06FtxPfARAvelAJ9hHVtY2PpTSxTqz/a+pJ5sb11itACgp6mP
kPy7+rN+qTEmYuova1EmJXI=
=Dwgt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----