lsb-release in edgy displays "No LSB modules are available."

Bug #66914 reported by Paul Sladen
40
This bug affects 7 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
lsb (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

'lsb_release' is in theory the future of telling what OS you're running. In Dapper, this displays:

  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description: Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS
  Release: 6.06
  Codename: dapper

On edgy, we now get:

  $ lsb_release
  No LSB modules are available.

'/etc/debian_version' contains:

  testing/unstable

'lsb_release' is doing a 'dpkg-query' is actually what's failing, I guess it's looking for the LSB modules. Doing 'apt-get install lsb' suggests:

  The following NEW packages will be installed
  alien lsb lsb-core lsb-cxx lsb-desktop lsb-graphics mailx ncurses-term pax postfix

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Rode (sebastian-ro-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Confirmed on hardy

Changed in lsb-release:
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote :

This behaviour seems correct to me. http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/lsbrelease.html says "If no options are given, the -v option is assumed." -v requires the display of LSB modules, which in Debian/Ubuntu are implemented by the lsb-* metapackages. If you have none of those installed, then you'll get the output you quote.

However, if you simply say 'lsb_release -a', you'll get the information you asked for. This is in accordance with the specification for lsb_release.

Incidentally, I believe that you are mistaken about the behaviour in dapper:

(dapper)cjwatson@ronne:~$ lsb_release
No LSB modules are available.
(dapper)cjwatson@ronne:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 6.06.2 LTS
Release: 6.06
Codename: dapper

Changed in lsb:
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Tor Klingberg (tor-klingberg) wrote :

It would be nice if something more informative was printed.

Revision history for this message
Peanuts (peanutsmonkey) wrote :

This bug also affects 12.04 LTS

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.