No way to tell when a change needs reapproval
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenStack Core Infrastructure |
Fix Released
|
High
|
James E. Blair | ||
Zuul |
Fix Released
|
High
|
James E. Blair |
Bug Description
We used to have the possibility to retrigger false-negative changes, but now the procedure involves asking a core reviewer to reapprove it.
However there is no way to tell that a change needs reapproval, since gerrit shows exactly the same state whether reapproval was done or not:
Status: Review in Progress
Checkmark in Approved column by <original approver>
If the reapprover is the same as the orginal approver, reapproval even does not appear in comments: for example in https:/
This results in anger, fury, and a lot of unnecessary pings.
Would be great if you could tell that your review is actually approved/queued for testing.
Changed in zuul: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
I think the confusion mostly comes from the status of the change still showing "review in progress" while the review is no longer in progress and the change is actually waiting for tests/merge to happen.