Please sync tuxpaint 1:0.9.22-1 from debian testing

I'm fairly sure that debian/patches/fix-build-dep.patch is obsolete, as we don't change the build deps any more (that change was dropped a long time ago).

debian/patches/fix-gettext-domain.patch is also obsolete as tuxpaint isn't covered by language packs any more.

+ - debian/control: tuxpaint-data recommends (not depends) on
+ tuxpaint-stamps-default | tuxpaint-stamps.

The dependency changes also don't seem to be necessary any more. This was bug 82510, but in current Debian tuxpaint-stamps-default only recommends tuxpaint, so there is no cyclic dependency which would break apt.

Thus I think we can just sync this. Do you agree?

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Martin Pitt <email address hidden> wrote:
> I'm fairly sure that debian/patches/fix-build-dep.patch is obsolete, as
> we don't change the build deps any more (that change was dropped a long
> time ago).

indeed... a test build shows it build fine without.

> debian/patches/fix-gettext-domain.patch is also obsolete as tuxpaint
> isn't covered by language packs any more.

umh... what's the canonical way to be aware of this?
In the past I keep every change about this, being unsure of how to check it.

> + - debian/control: tuxpaint-data recommends (not depends) on
> + tuxpaint-stamps-default | tuxpaint-stamps.
>
> The dependency changes also don't seem to be necessary any more. This
> was bug 82510, but in current Debian tuxpaint-stamps-default only
> recommends tuxpaint, so there is no cyclic dependency which would break
> apt.

right.

> Thus I think we can just sync this. Do you agree?

yes, please do (and if can tell me how to check the translation stuff would be great)

 summary "Please sync tuxpaint 1:0.9.22-1 from debian testing"

--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB
more about me: http://mapreri.org
Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo

> umh... what's the canonical way to be aware of this?

Good question -- The Ubuntu desktop team should generally know, but it's that sort of knowledge which almost always exists only in the heads of maintainers :/

I'll sync the package, thanks!

This bug was fixed in the package tuxpaint - 1:0.9.22-1
Sponsored for Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)

---------------
tuxpaint (1:0.9.22-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release. (Closes: #722933)
  * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format.
  * Dependencies fixed.
    (Closes: #619724, #648787, #726580, #731728, #738252, #741671, #741691)

 -- Ben Armstrong <email address hidden> Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:20:50 -0300