[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (31 -> 32) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Mantic

Bug #2060732 reported by Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Bionic
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Jammy
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Mantic
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[ Impact ]

This release brings both bug-fixes and new features for the Pro Client, and we would like to make sure all of our supported customers have access to these improvements on all releases.

The most important changes are:
 - d/apparmor:introduce new ubuntu_pro_esm_cache apparmor policy
 - api:
   + u.pro.attac.token.full_token_attach.v1: add suppport for attach with token
   + u.pro.services.disable.v1: add support for disable operation
   + u.pro.services.enable.v1: add support for enable operation
   + u.pro.detach.v1: add support for detach operation
   + u.pro.status.is_attached.v1: add extra fields to API response
   + u.pro.services.dependencies.v1: add support for service dependencies
   + u.pro.security.fix.*.plan.v1: update ESM cache during plan API if needed
 - config: create public and private config (GH: #2809)
 - messaging: add consistent messaging for end-of-contract

See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs.

[ Test Plan ]

The following development and SRU process was followed:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuAdvantageToolsUpdates

The Pro Client developers will be in charge of attaching the artifacts of the appropriate test runs to the bug, and will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.

Additionally, we will perform manual tests for the public/private config feature that will be better discussed in the next section

Finally, we will also perform another verification for an apparmor issue that
is described here:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2067319

We will run the full test suite for version 32.2 and run only again only the affected scenarios for this apparmor issue that is fixed on 32.3. Please refer
to the apparmor bug for the full plan regarding the verification of this SRU

[ Discussion]

This release will be introducing a split on our config for public and private information. This is to be explicit in the behavior a non-root and root user will see when running pro config show. For example,
we believe that a non-root user should not see proxy data in pro config show. This information is now stored in a private config file.

We need a mechanism to ensure that old versions of the Pro client would also get that split. To do that, we have created a script to run on postinst to adapt the existing pro config into this new setting.

However, we have recently introduced the new ubuntu-pro-client package. That means that we cannot know beforehand from which package the user would be upgrading from, ubuntu-advantage-tools or ubuntu-pro-client.

If the system already has ubuntu-pro-client and is upgrading to a new version of ubuntu-pro-client, that means all migrations present in ubuntu-advantage-tools.postinst must have already run at the time the system upgraded to the renamed ubuntu-pro-client. That mean this config migration should happen on ubuntu-pro-client.postinst

If upgrading from before the rename to the current version (from before version 31), then not necessarily all migrations inside of ubuntu-advantage-tools.postinst will have already run. Because the migrations present in this file may depend on those previous migrations, then we need to make the migration on ubuntu-advantage-tools.postinst

That is because there might be users running an old version of ubuntu-advantage-tools that have not yet upgraded to version 27.14. This version is the one that introduces the /var/lib/ubuntu-advantage/user-config.json. Therefore, we need to ensure to this migration happens first, before our public/private migration.

Because of that, we are coordinating which postinst script will execute the migration. A more detailed explanation of this logic can be found on the script itself, lib/postinst-migrations.sh

[ Changelog ]

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Mantic):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-mantic
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-jammy
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-bionic
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-xenial
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~16.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~16.04) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (i386)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~23.10)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~23.10) for mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/0.99.39 (armhf)
update-manager/1:23.10.1 (arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/mantic/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~24.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~24.04) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
update-motd/unknown (s390x)
wsl-pro-service/0.1.4 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~22.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~22.04) for jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/0.99.22.9 (armhf)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-motd/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32~20.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32~20.04) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~24.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~24.04) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
wsl-pro-service/0.1.4 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~20.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~20.04) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~16.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~16.04) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (i386)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.1

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

 -- Lucas Moura <email address hidden> Tue, 14 May 2024 11:22:35 +0200

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

About the noble dep8 failures, check this conversation from irc in #ubuntu-devel:

https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/05/21/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t15:53

<paride> ahasenack, did that happen more than once?
<paride> ahasenack, not that once is ok
<ahasenack> yes, in multiple architectures
<ahasenack> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/software-properties/noble/amd64 for example
<paride> ahasenack, I just reproduced it locally
<ahasenack> 0.99.48 extracted fine with apt-get source here, noble
<paride> it tries to download a different version:\
<paride> apt-get source -d -q --only-source software-properties=0.99.48.1
<paride> and this fails: E: Can not find version '0.99.48.1' of package 'software-properties'
<ahasenack> where is 0.99.48.1 coming from?
<ahasenack> noble has 0.99.48, and noble-proposed has 0.99.49
<paride> ahasenack, checking
<ahasenack> juliank: do you know something abouv this? I vaguely remember a comment from you in an SRU that mfo was checking
<juliank> paride, ahasenack So it gets confused by software-properties-qt temporarily existing in its own source package in a 0.99.48.1
<juliank> Well I say temporarily but that is in the release pocket
<juliank> and it seems to use that to determine the version of software-properties source package to download
<paride> I wonder if some changes I introduced locally to the "find source package to download" algorithm would work better
<ahasenack> why would a different source package interfere here?
<ahasenack> just because it's a substring match?
<juliank> ahasenack: autopkgtest tries to find out the source version to download but it looks at the wrong binary package
<paride> ahasenack, it is not that simple
<juliank> something like that
<paride> ahasenack, let me test from master, i.e. with https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/merge_requests/324 merged in
<ahasenack> paride: ok
<paride> ahasenack, still fail, same failure mode
<paride> *fails

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Also see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/2066290

troubleshooting ongoing, but there seems to be a mess with src:software-properties and src:software-properties-qt both building bin:software-properties-qt

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~16.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~16.04) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.1~24.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1~24.04) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~24.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~24.04) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-motd/unknown (s390x)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~16.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~16.04) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~23.10)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~23.10) for mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/unknown (s390x)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/mantic/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~22.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~22.04) for jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~20.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~20.04) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.2~18.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~18.04) for bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

description: updated
Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

We have run the full ubuntu-advantage-tools integration (behave) test suite against the version in -proposed. The results are attached.

Some tests are failing, but this is expected:

* Upgrade from Bionic to Focal: Apparmor related issues that will be fixed on 32.3
* cloud-init related tests on Noble Pro cloud

Revision history for this message
Renan Rodrigo (renanrodrigo) wrote :

Context on the cloud-init failures:

Cloud-init's newer version changed the key used in cloud config for the Pro client from ubuntu_advantage to ubuntu_pro. Because it is a "breaking" change, this works fine on Focal and Jammy, where both keys are accepted, but not on Noble.

On Noble, when you use ubuntu_advantage, the functionality itself works but you get a warning and cloud-init is left in a degraded state - breaking our test expectations that all is good on their side.

We changed the key to `ubuntu_pro` in tests so cloud-init can work well on Noble, and it does. But the catch is: the support for the `ubuntu_pro` key is only implemented in THIS version of the Client, >=32, which is in -proposed. When we launch the machines for testing, we are not using the package from proposed yet - we boot with cloud-config being considered in the installed version, and install from proposed later. This leads to the following conclusion:

- our test is meant to verify the Client's behavior with the new key, and what is breaking is the cloud-init integration. So those failures are not related to the proposed package at all, and should not block verification for the SRU.

- this is and has been true for a while, and those tests are always executed, which carries the side effect of guaranteeing some extent of cloud-init integration, but only after released.

- We have assured this particular integration works using builds from local / daily PPAs.

So all is good to proceed here despite those failures.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~16.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~16.04) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3~24.04)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~24.04) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
wsl-pro-service/0.1.4 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-advantage-tools

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) wrote :

We have marked the apparmor issue as verification-done:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2067319

Due to that, we are also marking this one as verification-done too

tags: added: verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-focal verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic verification-done-noble verification-done-xenial
removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic verification-needed-noble verification-needed-xenial
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Please also see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2067319/comments/1 for the rationale why the full test plan is not being run again for this bug here.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Doing an early release of this according to point 7 in the plan from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2067319/comments/1

Autopkgtests are clear now.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.3~24.04

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~24.04) noble; urgency=medium

  * Backport 32.3 to noble (LP: #2060732)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust the profiles to account for usr-merge consequences
    (LP: #2067319)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust rules for violations found during testing (LP: #2066929)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/postinst: ensure migrations happen in correct package postinst (GH: #2982)
  * d/apparmor: introduce new ubuntu_pro_esm_cache apparmor policy
  * New upstream release 32 (LP: #2060732)
    - api:
      + u.pro.attach.token.full_token_attach.v1: add support for attach
        with token
      + u.pro.services.disable.v1: add support for disable operation
      + u.pro.services.enable.v1: add support for enable operation
      + u.pro.detach.v1: add support for detach operation
      + u.pro.status.is_attached.v1: add extra fields to API response
      + u.pro.services.dependencies.v1: add support for service dependencies
      + u.pro.security.fix.*.plan.v1: update ESM cache during plan API
        if needed
    - apt_news: add architectures and packages selectors filters for apt news
    - cli:
      + improved cli/log message for unexpected errors (GH: #2600)
      + properly handle setting empty config values (GH: #2925)
    - cloud-init: support ubuntu_pro user-data
    - collect-logs: update default output file to pro_logs.tar.gz (LP: #2033313)
    - config: create public and private config (GH: #2809)
    - entitlements:
      + update logic that checks if a service is enabled (LP: #2031192)
    - fips: warn/confirm with user if enabling fips downgrades the kernel
    - fix: warn users if ESM cache cannot be updated (GH: #2841)
    - logging:
      + use journald logging for all systemd services
      + add redundancy to secret redaction
    - messaging:
      + add consistent messaging for end of contract state
      + make explicit that unattached enable/disable is a noop (GH: #2487)
      + make explicit that disabling a disabled service is a noop
      + make explicit that enabling an enabled service is a noop
    - notices: filter unreadable notices when listing notices (GH: #2898)

 -- Renan Rodrigo <email address hidden> Tue, 28 May 2024 15:15:48 -0300

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-advantage-tools has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.3~23.10

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~23.10) mantic; urgency=medium

  * Backport 32.3 to mantic (LP: #2060732)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust the profiles to account for usr-merge consequences
    (LP: #2067319)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust rules for violations found during testing (LP: #2066929)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/postinst: ensure migrations happen in correct package postinst (GH: #2982)
  * d/apparmor: introduce new ubuntu_pro_esm_cache apparmor policy
  * New upstream release 32 (LP: #2060732)
    - api:
      + u.pro.attach.token.full_token_attach.v1: add support for attach
        with token
      + u.pro.services.disable.v1: add support for disable operation
      + u.pro.services.enable.v1: add support for enable operation
      + u.pro.detach.v1: add support for detach operation
      + u.pro.status.is_attached.v1: add extra fields to API response
      + u.pro.services.dependencies.v1: add support for service dependencies
      + u.pro.security.fix.*.plan.v1: update ESM cache during plan API
        if needed
    - apt_news: add architectures and packages selectors filters for apt news
    - cli:
      + improved cli/log message for unexpected errors (GH: #2600)
      + properly handle setting empty config values (GH: #2925)
    - cloud-init: support ubuntu_pro user-data
    - collect-logs: update default output file to pro_logs.tar.gz (LP: #2033313)
    - config: create public and private config (GH: #2809)
    - entitlements:
      + update logic that checks if a service is enabled (LP: #2031192)
    - fips: warn/confirm with user if enabling fips downgrades the kernel
    - fix: warn users if ESM cache cannot be updated (GH: #2841)
    - logging:
      + use journald logging for all systemd services
      + add redundancy to secret redaction
    - messaging:
      + add consistent messaging for end of contract state
      + make explicit that unattached enable/disable is a noop (GH: #2487)
      + make explicit that disabling a disabled service is a noop
      + make explicit that enabling an enabled service is a noop
    - notices: filter unreadable notices when listing notices (GH: #2898)

 -- Renan Rodrigo <email address hidden> Tue, 28 May 2024 15:15:45 -0300

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Mantic):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.3~22.04

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~22.04) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Backport 32.3 to jammy (LP: #2060732)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust the profiles to account for usr-merge consequences
    (LP: #2067319)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust rules for violations found during testing (LP: #2066929)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/postinst: ensure migrations happen in correct package postinst (GH: #2982)
  * d/apparmor: introduce new ubuntu_pro_esm_cache apparmor policy
  * New upstream release 32 (LP: #2060732)
    - api:
      + u.pro.attach.token.full_token_attach.v1: add support for attach
        with token
      + u.pro.services.disable.v1: add support for disable operation
      + u.pro.services.enable.v1: add support for enable operation
      + u.pro.detach.v1: add support for detach operation
      + u.pro.status.is_attached.v1: add extra fields to API response
      + u.pro.services.dependencies.v1: add support for service dependencies
      + u.pro.security.fix.*.plan.v1: update ESM cache during plan API
        if needed
    - apt_news: add architectures and packages selectors filters for apt news
    - cli:
      + improved cli/log message for unexpected errors (GH: #2600)
      + properly handle setting empty config values (GH: #2925)
    - cloud-init: support ubuntu_pro user-data
    - collect-logs: update default output file to pro_logs.tar.gz (LP: #2033313)
    - config: create public and private config (GH: #2809)
    - entitlements:
      + update logic that checks if a service is enabled (LP: #2031192)
    - fips: warn/confirm with user if enabling fips downgrades the kernel
    - fix: warn users if ESM cache cannot be updated (GH: #2841)
    - logging:
      + use journald logging for all systemd services
      + add redundancy to secret redaction
    - messaging:
      + add consistent messaging for end of contract state
      + make explicit that unattached enable/disable is a noop (GH: #2487)
      + make explicit that disabling a disabled service is a noop
      + make explicit that enabling an enabled service is a noop
    - notices: filter unreadable notices when listing notices (GH: #2898)

 -- Renan Rodrigo <email address hidden> Tue, 28 May 2024 15:15:42 -0300

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.3~20.04

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~20.04) focal; urgency=medium

  * Backport 32.3 to focal (LP: #2060732)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust the profiles to account for usr-merge consequences
    (LP: #2067319)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust rules for violations found during testing (LP: #2066929)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/postinst: ensure migrations happen in correct package postinst (GH: #2982)
  * d/apparmor: introduce new ubuntu_pro_esm_cache apparmor policy
  * New upstream release 32 (LP: #2060732)
    - api:
      + u.pro.attach.token.full_token_attach.v1: add support for attach
        with token
      + u.pro.services.disable.v1: add support for disable operation
      + u.pro.services.enable.v1: add support for enable operation
      + u.pro.detach.v1: add support for detach operation
      + u.pro.status.is_attached.v1: add extra fields to API response
      + u.pro.services.dependencies.v1: add support for service dependencies
      + u.pro.security.fix.*.plan.v1: update ESM cache during plan API
        if needed
    - apt_news: add architectures and packages selectors filters for apt news
    - cli:
      + improved cli/log message for unexpected errors (GH: #2600)
      + properly handle setting empty config values (GH: #2925)
    - cloud-init: support ubuntu_pro user-data
    - collect-logs: update default output file to pro_logs.tar.gz (LP: #2033313)
    - config: create public and private config (GH: #2809)
    - entitlements:
      + update logic that checks if a service is enabled (LP: #2031192)
    - fips: warn/confirm with user if enabling fips downgrades the kernel
    - fix: warn users if ESM cache cannot be updated (GH: #2841)
    - logging:
      + use journald logging for all systemd services
      + add redundancy to secret redaction
    - messaging:
      + add consistent messaging for end of contract state
      + make explicit that unattached enable/disable is a noop (GH: #2487)
      + make explicit that disabling a disabled service is a noop
      + make explicit that enabling an enabled service is a noop
    - notices: filter unreadable notices when listing notices (GH: #2898)

 -- Renan Rodrigo <email address hidden> Tue, 28 May 2024 15:15:39 -0300

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.3~18.04

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~18.04) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Backport 32.3 to bionic (LP: #2060732)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust the profiles to account for usr-merge consequences
    (LP: #2067319)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust rules for violations found during testing (LP: #2066929)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/postinst: ensure migrations happen in correct package postinst (GH: #2982)
  * d/apparmor: introduce new ubuntu_pro_esm_cache apparmor policy
  * New upstream release 32 (LP: #2060732)
    - api:
      + u.pro.attach.token.full_token_attach.v1: add support for attach
        with token
      + u.pro.services.disable.v1: add support for disable operation
      + u.pro.services.enable.v1: add support for enable operation
      + u.pro.detach.v1: add support for detach operation
      + u.pro.status.is_attached.v1: add extra fields to API response
      + u.pro.services.dependencies.v1: add support for service dependencies
      + u.pro.security.fix.*.plan.v1: update ESM cache during plan API
        if needed
    - apt_news: add architectures and packages selectors filters for apt news
    - cli:
      + improved cli/log message for unexpected errors (GH: #2600)
      + properly handle setting empty config values (GH: #2925)
    - cloud-init: support ubuntu_pro user-data
    - collect-logs: update default output file to pro_logs.tar.gz (LP: #2033313)
    - config: create public and private config (GH: #2809)
    - entitlements:
      + update logic that checks if a service is enabled (LP: #2031192)
    - fips: warn/confirm with user if enabling fips downgrades the kernel
    - fix: warn users if ESM cache cannot be updated (GH: #2841)
    - logging:
      + use journald logging for all systemd services
      + add redundancy to secret redaction
    - messaging:
      + add consistent messaging for end of contract state
      + make explicit that unattached enable/disable is a noop (GH: #2487)
      + make explicit that disabling a disabled service is a noop
      + make explicit that enabling an enabled service is a noop
    - notices: filter unreadable notices when listing notices (GH: #2898)

 -- Renan Rodrigo <email address hidden> Tue, 28 May 2024 15:15:36 -0300

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-advantage-tools - 32.3~16.04

---------------
ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3~16.04) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Backport 32.3 to xenial (LP: #2060732)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.3) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust the profiles to account for usr-merge consequences
    (LP: #2067319)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: adjust rules for violations found during testing (LP: #2066929)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/apparmor: allow access for /etc/os-release on all supported
    profiles (LP: #2065573)
  * apport: get path for timer job status from the correct place (LP: #2065616)

ubuntu-advantage-tools (32) oracular; urgency=medium

  * d/postinst: ensure migrations happen in correct package postinst (GH: #2982)
  * d/apparmor: introduce new ubuntu_pro_esm_cache apparmor policy
  * New upstream release 32 (LP: #2060732)
    - api:
      + u.pro.attach.token.full_token_attach.v1: add support for attach
        with token
      + u.pro.services.disable.v1: add support for disable operation
      + u.pro.services.enable.v1: add support for enable operation
      + u.pro.detach.v1: add support for detach operation
      + u.pro.status.is_attached.v1: add extra fields to API response
      + u.pro.services.dependencies.v1: add support for service dependencies
      + u.pro.security.fix.*.plan.v1: update ESM cache during plan API
        if needed
    - apt_news: add architectures and packages selectors filters for apt news
    - cli:
      + improved cli/log message for unexpected errors (GH: #2600)
      + properly handle setting empty config values (GH: #2925)
    - cloud-init: support ubuntu_pro user-data
    - collect-logs: update default output file to pro_logs.tar.gz (LP: #2033313)
    - config: create public and private config (GH: #2809)
    - entitlements:
      + update logic that checks if a service is enabled (LP: #2031192)
    - fips: warn/confirm with user if enabling fips downgrades the kernel
    - fix: warn users if ESM cache cannot be updated (GH: #2841)
    - logging:
      + use journald logging for all systemd services
      + add redundancy to secret redaction
    - messaging:
      + add consistent messaging for end of contract state
      + make explicit that unattached enable/disable is a noop (GH: #2487)
      + make explicit that disabling a disabled service is a noop
      + make explicit that enabling an enabled service is a noop
    - notices: filter unreadable notices when listing notices (GH: #2898)

 -- Renan Rodrigo <email address hidden> Tue, 28 May 2024 15:15:32 -0300

Changed in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.