fglrx incompatible with x1600pro agp

Bug #216629 reported by Adam Honse
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: xorg-driver-fglrx

I have a Diamond branded 512MB Radeon X1600 Pro (R530) AGP 4X graphics card. Ubuntu 8.04 Beta tells me to use the ATi Restricted Drivers (the fglrx package) and installs them, but then when it restarts, the screen remains black instead of showing the login screen. I went into recovery and restored X. It seems to be using Vesa instead of fglrx. The old fglrx (pre-AIGLX support) from 7.10 worked fine, then I updated it to the new 8.42 (AIGLX) version and it had some troubles, but finally kind of worked. Then I installed 8.04 and it hasn't done anything but crash. My friend also has a card that uses fglrx and he said his works, but mine refuses to work.

Revision history for this message
Adam Honse (calcprogrammer1) wrote :

Just playing around with it, my Xorg.conf has:

Section "Device"
     Identifier "Configured Video Device"
     Driver "fglrx"
     BusID "PCI:1:00.0"
EndSection

lspci says:

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV530 [Radeon X1600]
01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV530 [Radeon X1600] (Secondary)

startx/xinit fails with:

(WW) fglrx: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:0) found
(WW) fglrx: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:1) found
(EE) No devices detected.

Fatal server error:
no screens found

So, I have a Radeon X1600 (RV530) and fglrx doesn't even know what it is...that's great. So, how do you get fglrx to detect the card?

Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

Remove the BusID line, does it work then? Hardy doesn't write that anymore.

Changed in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Andreas Moog (ampelbein) wrote : Closing this Bug

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click on the current status, under the Status column, and change
the Status back to "New". Thanks again!

 status invalid
 subscribe

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkixLpIACgkQ06FgkPZwicS3iwCfaNCvuF6IZmQC7KteVPvU/MXY
zRgAoO9RnVoHek7BgJAmFUephHlVskQz
=VVED
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Changed in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.