CVE 2012-0058
The kiocb_batch_free function in fs/aio.c in the Linux kernel before 3.2.2 allows local users to cause a denial of service (OOPS) via vectors that trigger incorrect iocb management.
Related bugs and status
CVE-2012-0058 (Candidate) is related to these bugs:
Bug #927892: CVE-2012-0058
| Summary | In | Importance | Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Natty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Natty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Maverick) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Maverick) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Hardy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Hardy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Hardy) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Maverick) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Natty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Oneiric) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Trusty) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Utopic) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Vivid) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Wily) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Precise) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Trusty) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Vivid) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-goldfish (Ubuntu Wily) | Medium | Invalid | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) | Undecided | New | ||
| 927892 | CVE-2012-0058 | linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu Precise) | Undecided | Won't Fix | ||
See the 
CVE page on Mitre.org
for more details.
