Surely `dput` should identify the broken changesfile name and refuse to upload it. That's pretty much what would happen on a SSH-based which could perform several integrity checks synchronously.
I'm tempted to create a FAQ explaining the current undesired behaviour on the Soyuz-side, invalidate this bug on Soyuz context and target it to `dput` if we all agree.
Surely `dput` should identify the broken changesfile name and refuse to upload it. That's pretty much what would happen on a SSH-based which could perform several integrity checks synchronously.
I'm tempted to create a FAQ explaining the current undesired behaviour on the Soyuz-side, invalidate this bug on Soyuz context and target it to `dput` if we all agree.