Comment 3 for bug 1476527
Revision history for this message
| Akihiro Motoki (amotoki) wrote Re: RFE - Add common classifier resource | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
Defining a common classifier sounds good. It will bring users to consistent API definitions across resources.
Although a corresponding proposal was proposed for review, I would suggest to continue the discussion as a neutron-specs review.
I think it is better the discussion covers:
- common classifier resource definitions (accepted values, how fields are interpreted and so on)
- how common classifier resource can be consumed by each implementation
- how to deal with unnecessary fields (required fields varies depending on features. users needs a way to know which fields are available or not)