Comment 4 for bug 978958

Revision history for this message
Julien Danjou (jdanjou) wrote :

I've fixed this one too in https://review.openstack.org/#change,6459 anyway.

and as I wrote in the first message:

"This is raised because the code assume the label of the network will be private, but it might be things like "private_12" since network/manager.py creates network with such names."

So clearly, I doubt anything in the spec says that IT IS named "private". :)