© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
Right, I understand -- but introducing the dependency was an explicit decision (#1948748), and it seems it is broken for its main use case. So in the simplest case the recommends: could be reverted, and reintroduced once this is understood?