Comment 2 for bug 43169

This request said nothing of Dapper. If it isn't fixed until after Dapper, that's fine. I don't know the procedure for requesting an exception, though I'm sure I could find it. But, it's probably not worth the risk for one little pam module. For now, I'm going to investigate packaging an older version of pam_keyring (before the changes which require pam >= 0.99).

Anyway, in summary, I don't see why we can't keep this item open.