Interesting. My thinking then is that the poppler-data package
shouldn't be a separate package at all. I suspect that upstream they
are shipped together as a single thing? Of course, another way to
resolve that logical dependency is to just have poppler depend on
poppler-data. I wonder if that was the case in a previous version of
Ubuntu?
--- Mike
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, madbiologist <email address hidden> wrote:
> Here is the corresponding output of pdffonts after installing poppler-
> data. Note that the error messages are gone, which correlates with the
> correct rendering of the document.
>
> ** Attachment added: "pdffonts_output-after.txt"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37343716/pdffonts_output-after.txt
>
> --
> Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “poppler” package in Ubuntu: New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: evince
>
> The fontspec documentation for XeTeX (available at CTAN at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/fontspec/) does not render correctly in Evince. At some point in the past (that is, at least two releases ago) it worked just fine. Scribd, the Web viewer for documents like this, renders the file just fine (and Evince still renders it incorrectly downloading it from there).
>
> I will try to setup another version of Ubuntu in a VM and find the last version that worked sometime today if I have the chance (though if someone is running an older version of Ubuntu that comes across this bug, a works/doesn't work result would be nice). Look on page 3, there is a lot of blank space where there should be text. Looking at it on Scribed at the same spot shows what it should appear as.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> Architecture: amd64
> CheckboxSubmission: 34d1fedb40bfa93f2c7055fdb74261e6
> CheckboxSystem: e704f33cc0866ff0f0256a33de39ea1c
> Date: Fri Jan 1 09:35:00 2010
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027)
> NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
> Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2
> ProcEnviron:
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic
> SourcePackage: evince
> Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/502084/+subscribe
>
Interesting. My thinking then is that the poppler-data package
shouldn't be a separate package at all. I suspect that upstream they
are shipped together as a single thing? Of course, another way to
resolve that logical dependency is to just have poppler depend on
poppler-data. I wonder if that was the case in a previous version of
Ubuntu?
--- Mike
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, madbiologist <email address hidden> wrote: output- after.txt" launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 37343716/ pdffonts_ output- after.txt /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 502084 www.ctan. org/tex- archive/ macros/ xetex/latex/ fontspec/) does not render correctly in Evince. At some point in the past (that is, at least two releases ago) it worked just fine. Scribd, the Web viewer for documents like this, renders the file just fine (and Evince still renders it incorrectly downloading it from there). f2c7055fdb74261 e6 0f0256a33de39ea 1c dules: fglrx ature: Ubuntu 2.6.31- 16.53-generic /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ poppler/ +bug/502084/ +subscribe
> Here is the corresponding output of pdffonts after installing poppler-
> data. Note that the error messages are gone, which correlates with the
> correct rendering of the document.
>
> ** Attachment added: "pdffonts_
> http://
>
> --
> Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “poppler” package in Ubuntu: New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: evince
>
> The fontspec documentation for XeTeX (available at CTAN at http://
>
> I will try to setup another version of Ubuntu in a VM and find the last version that worked sometime today if I have the chance (though if someone is running an older version of Ubuntu that comes across this bug, a works/doesn't work result would be nice). Look on page 3, there is a lot of blank space where there should be text. Looking at it on Scribed at the same spot shows what it should appear as.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> Architecture: amd64
> CheckboxSubmission: 34d1fedb40bfa93
> CheckboxSystem: e704f33cc0866ff
> Date: Fri Jan 1 09:35:00 2010
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027)
> NonfreeKernelMo
> Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2
> ProcEnviron:
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> ProcVersionSign
> SourcePackage: evince
> Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https:/
>