Debian is almost certainly not going to change the architecture name,
and nor are we - it's unrealistic to expect that and so I should save
you time tilting against windmills. The architecture names are, by
design, fixed identifiers, and changing them is a heroically vast amount
of work for very little gain.
Regarding your proposed release note: wouldn't we simply carry over the
existing one from the Maverick notes? It seems clear enough, and
accurate. In any case, I wasn't actually suggesting a change to the
release notes, but rather a change to the descriptions on http://releases.ubuntu.com/natty/ etc.; the text there was written a
while ago and could probably use an update.
Debian is almost certainly not going to change the architecture name,
and nor are we - it's unrealistic to expect that and so I should save
you time tilting against windmills. The architecture names are, by
design, fixed identifiers, and changing them is a heroically vast amount
of work for very little gain.
Regarding your proposed release note: wouldn't we simply carry over the releases. ubuntu. com/natty/ etc.; the text there was written a
existing one from the Maverick notes? It seems clear enough, and
accurate. In any case, I wasn't actually suggesting a change to the
release notes, but rather a change to the descriptions on
http://
while ago and could probably use an update.