© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #10)
> We should probably do the ID_FS_TYPE comparison inside part-id only when we are
> sure we are dealing with the main block device and not a partition. Have to be
> careful here, remember we support kpartx style partitions now...
>
> This commit actually broke partition table parsing for the partitions itself,
> e.g. this output [...] if the partition in question had a recognizable
> filesystem.
Hm, I'm afraid I don't follow -- If a partition has a recognizable file system, how can it have a partition table at the same time? The device which you quoted in the reversion git log, which ID_FS_* properties did it have, and which kind of partition was that?
I see that the previous change would break situations where a particular device (raw or partition, doesn't matter) is both a fs and a partition table, but I don't know how this is possible?