[SRU] Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)

Can you please write a test case that demonstrates the observable effect on reverse dependencies? The changed installation path can certainly be observed, but that's not proof that the proposed one is actually "correct" in the sense of "works for consumers of oce". Thanks!

rejected from queue while waiting for test case.

Sorry pitti, I missed your question as I wasn't automatically subscribed to this bug.

As far as I can determine, this change is cosmetic. The files that get installed into lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/oce-0.17 are mostly .cmake files that end up in the liboce-*-dev packages.

Except for the files that end up in oce-draw, which has no reverse-dependencies but is a build dependency of freecad and gmsh.

Debdiff for Xenial SRU attached to LP: #1556680.

Hello neomilium, or anyone else affected,

Accepted oce into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oce/0.17.1-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Brian,

I confirm that I now can build and use HeeksCAD, with its module HeeksCNC, both depending on OCE.

I used liboce-visualization-dev/xenial-proposed package and regular building of HeeksCAD and HeeksCNC works as expected.

Thanks !

This bug was fixed in the package oce - 0.17.1-1ubuntu0.1

---------------
oce (0.17.1-1ubuntu0.1) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Backport 0.17-1-2 from Yakkety as an SRU, including changes:
    + Build-Depend on libfreeimageplus-dev instead of libfreeimage-dev
      in order to build with freeimage >= 3.17.0.
    + Rebuild against freeimage >= 3.17.0 to pick up correct library path
      in OCE04_VisualizationTargets-relwithdebinfo.cmake. (LP: #1556680)
    + Install files in /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/oce-0.17. (LP: #1556685)

 -- Graham Inggs <email address hidden> Sun, 22 May 2016 15:08:27 +0200

The verification of the Stable Release Update for oce has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.