SRU: update nuitka to the version from yakkety (python 3.5 fixes)

Bug #1599240 reported by Matthias Klose
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nuitka (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

As seen in a test rebuild, nuitka fails some of it's tests with python3.5 in a test rebuild of 16.04 LTS using Python 3.5.2. The nuitka 0.19 and 0.20 releases carry a lot of python 3.5 related bug fixes. Instead of backporting, I'm proposing to backport the current version from yakkety to xenial. nuitka is a leaf package, not having any reverse dependencies or reverse build-dependencies.

Acceptance criteria:

Package builds (using the Python 3.5.2 package) on all architectures and package tests pass.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

While this is a leaf package and thus does not jeopardize other packages, the test plan should still include some actual functionality test of nuitka. E. g. some example python file which then gets compiled with the current and the proposed nuitka, and then making sure that they behave the same. This doesn't need to be elaborate, as nuitka has unit tests -- but it doesn't have an autopkgtest integration test, so we should still make sure that the packaging is okay.

Changed in nuitka (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
Changed in nuitka (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Incomplete
status: Incomplete → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nuitka into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nuitka/0.5.21.2+ds-1~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

comparing the packages in xenial and xenial-proposed:

Files in second .deb but not in first
-------------------------------------
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/Nuitka-0.5.21.2.egg-info/PKG-INFO
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/Nuitka-0.5.21.2.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/Nuitka-0.5.21.2.egg-info/top_level.txt
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/build/static_src/MainProgram.cpp
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/optimizations/BytecodeDemotion.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/optimizations/Graphs.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/plugins/Plugins.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/plugins/standard/DataFileCollectorPlugin.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/plugins/standard/ImplicitImports.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/plugins/standard/PmwPlugin.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/utils/MemoryUsage.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/utils/SharedLibraries.py

Files in first .deb but not in second
-------------------------------------
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/Nuitka-0.5.18.1.egg-info
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/build/include/nuitka/helper/indexes.hpp
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/codegen/MainCodes.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/nuitka/nuitka/codegen/templates/CodeTemplatesMain.py

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Depends: {+g++-5 |+} g++-4.9 | g++-4.8 | g++-4.7 | g++-4.6 (>= 4.6.1) | g++-4.5 | g++-4.4 | clang (>= 3.0), scons (>= 2.0.0), python-dev (>= 2.6.6-2), python:any (>= [-2.6.6-7~)-] {+2.7.5-5~)+}
Installed-Size: [-2839-] {+2919+}
Version: [-0.5.18.1+ds-1-] {+0.5.21.2+ds-1~16.04+}

comparing the packages from yakkety and xenial-proposed:

File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Installed-Size: [-2918-] {+2919+}
Version: [-0.5.21.2+ds-1-] {+0.5.21.2+ds-1~16.04+}

These differences look like they are expected, and the backport builds the same binary as the version in yakkety.

tags: added: verification-done
removed: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package nuitka - 0.5.21.2+ds-1~16.04

---------------
nuitka (0.5.21.2+ds-1~16.04) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1599240. Fix test failures with Python 3.5.2.

nuitka (0.5.21.2+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream hotfix release.

nuitka (0.5.21.1+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream hotfix release.

  * Depends on g++-5 now.

nuitka (0.5.21+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.

nuitka (0.5.20+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.

nuitka (0.5.19.1+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream hotfix release.

nuitka (0.5.19+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:08:56 +0200

Changed in nuitka (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for nuitka has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.