Details pane against unavailable Pro updates is misleading

Bug #2043425 reported by Robie Basak
18
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status tracked in Noble
Xenial
Fix Committed
High
Nathan Teodosio
Bionic
Fix Released
High
Nathan Teodosio
Focal
Fix Committed
High
Nathan Teodosio
Jammy
Fix Released
High
Nathan Teodosio
Noble
Fix Released
High
Nathan Teodosio

Bug Description

* Impact

If Pro is not enabled, then the details pane against a Pro update misleads the user into believing that there is no update available.

Example of someone being misled: https://inteltechniques.com/blog/2023/11/12/ubuntu-pro-shenanigans/

Expected results: either no details presented, or the actual details of the potential Pro update presented

Actual results: a message that implies that there is no update available for this package, Pro or not.

* Test Case

Install the update on a system not attached to Pro, select an update in the Pro section, check the 'Version available' string, it should reflect the version that would be installed if pro was enabled

* Regression potential

The change is in the code getting the available version to display, if the logic was wrong it could lead to have the 'available version' label being missing or incorrect. The code could hit an exception if there was not non expected value

Related branches

Robie Basak (racb)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Indeed the UI there is confusing. When the system is not attached to Ubuntu Pro the updates are unknown to apt. We build the UI by getting a list of binaries from 'pro security-status' but we didn't include extra logic to adapt the 'details' section. The 'available' version comes from apt and in this case there is no update.

We could probably also get the version for the pro command to fix the 'available version' information but I'm unsure if we have a way to have access to the changelog to display actual content.

@Design, what would we recommend doing? Should we just fix the version even without changelog description? Hide the section? Add some text explaining how the Pro updates are different?

Revision history for this message
Renan Rodrigo (renanrodrigo) wrote :

Bringing the side conversation here:

- the Pro Client has https://canonical-ubuntu-pro-client.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/references/api.html#u-pro-packages-updates-v1 , which shows the same updates in security status but versioned and machine consumable (security status --format json will be deprecated at some point in time, when we are sure the APIs are sufficient)

- There is not currently a way of getting the changelogs for the ESM versions, and if there is and I don't know about it, not when you are unattached. So the good way to go would be replacing the changelog entry with this explanation about how Pro works a little different. If you want to include technical details from our side in this explanation I'm glad to help.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
assignee: nobody → Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio)
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: New → In Progress
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → In Progress
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Bionic):
status: New → In Progress
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → In Progress
assignee: nobody → Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio)
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Bionic):
assignee: nobody → Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio)
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Focal):
assignee: nobody → Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio)
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Jammy):
assignee: nobody → Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio)
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Focal):
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Bionic):
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Xenial):
importance: Undecided → High
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

This bug is referred to in uploads currently in the unapproved queue, but has no SRU template.

description: updated
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:22.04.17 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Focal):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:20.04.10.18 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-xenial
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:16.04.18 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Bionic):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed-bionic
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:18.04.11.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

Tested in Bionic virtual machine. Installed from proposed, and unnatached verified that the hello package says "2.10.1ubuntu0.1~esm1" for avaialable version, which is correct and differs from the installed version.

tags: added: verification-done-bionic
removed: verification-needed-bionic
Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

Tested in Jammy virtual machine. Installed from proposed, and unattached verified that the hello package says "2.10.2ubuntu4+esm1" for available version, which is correct and differs from the installed version.

tags: added: verification-done-jammy
removed: verification-needed-jammy
Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

Tested in Xenial virtual machine. Installed from proposed, and unattached verified that the hello package says "2.10.1ubuntu0.1~test2" for available version, which is correct and differs from the installed version.

tags: added: verification-done-xenial
removed: verification-needed-xenial
Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

Tested in Focal virtual machine. Installed from proposed, and unattached verified that the hello package says "2.10.2ubuntu3~esm1" for available version, which is correct and differs from the installed version.

tags: added: verification-done-focal
removed: verification-needed-focal
tags: added: verification-done
removed: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package update-manager - 1:22.04.17

---------------
update-manager (1:22.04.17) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Fix incorrect available version for Ubuntu Pro updates in unattached case
    (LP: #2043425).

update-manager (1:22.04.16) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - fix another linter error which was created while fixing a missing
      space in the previous upload...

update-manager (1:22.04.15) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - Address linter errors that cause autopkgtest to fail.

update-manager (1:22.04.14) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - Show Ubuntu Pro packages, whether the system is attached to Ubuntu Pro
      or not.
    - Replace Install now button by Enable Ubuntu Pro button when only Ubuntu
      Pro packages are available and the machine is not attached.
    - Fix checkbox and expander widget from overlapping.
    - Add News pane in a expander.
    - Replace notebook with Description and Changes tabs by a pane.

update-manager (1:22.04.13) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Fix Ubuntu Pro updates checkbox and expander widget from overlapping (LP: #1990450)

update-manager (1:22.04.12) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Update of the parsing for pro client changes (lp: #1990450)

update-manager (1:22.04.11) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Show pending Ubuntu pro packages (LP: #1990450)

 -- Nathan Pratta Teodosio <email address hidden> Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:07:06 +0100

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package update-manager - 1:24.04.2

---------------
update-manager (1:24.04.2) noble; urgency=medium

  * Fix linter warning that causes autopkgtest to fail.
  * Drop call to ua security-status --format=json.
    Use uaclient.api.u.pro.packages.updates.v1.updates instead.

 -- Nathan Pratta Teodosio <email address hidden> Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:32:20 +0100

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Noble):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package update-manager - 1:20.04.10.18

---------------
update-manager (1:20.04.10.18) focal; urgency=medium

  * Fix incorrect available version for Ubuntu Pro updates in unattached case
    (LP: #2043425).

update-manager (1:20.04.10.17) focal; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - fix another linter error which was created while fixing a missing
      space in the previous upload...

update-manager (1:20.04.10.16) focal; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - Address linter errors that cause autopkgtest to fail.

update-manager (1:20.04.10.15) focal; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - Show Ubuntu Pro packages, whether the system is attached to Ubuntu Pro
      or not.
    - Replace Install now button by Enable Ubuntu Pro button when only Ubuntu
      Pro packages are available and the machine is not attached.
    - Fix checkbox and expander widget from overlapping.
    - Add News pane in a expander.
    - Replace notebook with Description and Changes tabs by a pane.

update-manager (1:20.04.10.14) focal; urgency=medium

  * Fix Ubuntu Pro updates checkbox and expander widget from overlapping
    (LP: #1990450)

update-manager (1:20.04.10.13) focal; urgency=medium

  * Update of the parsing for pro client changes (lp: #1990450)

update-manager (1:20.04.10.12) focal; urgency=medium

  * Show pending Ubuntu pro packages (LP: #1990450)

 -- Nathan Pratta Teodosio <email address hidden> Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:28:54 +0100

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:20.04.10.19 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Released → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
removed: verification-done verification-done-focal
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:18.04.11.22 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

tags: added: verification-needed-bionic
removed: verification-done-bionic
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:16.04.19 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

tags: added: verification-needed-xenial
removed: verification-done-xenial
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:18.04.11.23 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:16.04.20 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

In a Focal virtual machine with Pro unattached, installed version .20 of update-manager from proposed, opened update-manager and verified that Midnight Commander in the Pro section shows

  Available version: 3:4.8.24-2ubuntu1+esm1

which is the correct version according to ua security-status --format=json.

tags: added: verification-done-focal
removed: verification-needed-focal
Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

In a Xenial virtual machine with Pro unattached, installed version .20 of update-manager from proposed, opened update-manager and verified that Nginx in the Pro section shows

  Available version: 1.10.3-0ubuntu0.16.04.5+esm5

tags: added: verification-done-xenial
removed: verification-needed-xenial
Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

In a Bionic virtual machine with Pro unattached, installed version .23 of update-manager from proposed, opened update-manager and verified that Hello in the Pro section shows

  Available version: 2:10-1ubuntu0.1~esm1

tags: added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package update-manager - 1:18.04.11.23

---------------
update-manager (1:18.04.11.23) bionic; urgency=medium

  * d/control: Depend on ubuntu-advantage-tools >= 30~.
    Fixes edge case whereby the program crashes upon an incomplete
    response from ua security-status (LP: #2049785).
  * The New Release dialog should take precedence over a list of updates dialog
    if the latter would only show Ubuntu Pro updates in an unattached system.
    (LP: #2051115).

update-manager (1:18.04.11.22) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Add back removed widgets to UI file to fix crash when updating
    Upgrade Manager from inside itself (LP: #2045918).

update-manager (1:18.04.11.21) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Fix incorrect available version for Ubuntu Pro updates in unattached case
    (LP: #2043425).

update-manager (1:18.04.11.20) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - fix another linter error which was created while fixing a missing
      space in the previous upload...

update-manager (1:18.04.11.19) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - Address linter errors that cause autopkgtest to fail.

update-manager (1:18.04.11.18) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Ubuntu Pro (LP: #1990450):
    - Show Ubuntu Pro packages, whether the system is attached to Ubuntu Pro
      or not.
    - Replace Install now button by Enable Ubuntu Pro button when only Ubuntu
      Pro packages are available and the machine is not attached.
    - Fix checkbox and expander widget from overlapping.
    - Add News pane in a expander.
    - Replace notebook with Description and Changes tabs by a pane.

update-manager (1:18.04.11.17) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Fix Ubuntu Pro updates checkbox and expander widget from overlapping
    (LP: #1990450)

update-manager (1:18.04.11.16) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Update of the parsing for pro client changes (lp: #1990450)

update-manager (1:18.04.11.15) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Show pending Ubuntu pro packages (LP: #1990450)

update-manager (1:18.04.11.14) bionic; urgency=medium

  * tests/test_meta_release_core.py: switch a test from using lucid to bionic
    as precise was removed from the archive. (LP: #1929865)

 -- Nathan Pratta Teodosio <email address hidden> Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:36:03 +0100

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Bionic):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package update-manager - 1:16.04.20

---------------
update-manager (1:16.04.20) xenial; urgency=medium

  * d/control: Depend on ubuntu-advantage-tools >= 30~.
    Fixes edge case whereby the program crashes upon an incomplete
    response from ua security-status (LP: #2049785).
  * The New Release dialog should take precedence over a list of updates dialog
    if the latter would only show Ubuntu Pro updates in an unattached system.
    (LP: #2051115).

update-manager (1:16.04.19) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Add back removed widgets to UI file to fix crash when updating
    Upgrade Manager from inside itself (LP: #2045918).

update-manager (1:16.04.18) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Implement the new Ubuntu Pro design (lp: #1990450).
    - Fuse the description and changes tabs into a single view.
    - Add button to attach to enable Ubuntu Pro if it is the only action
      available.
    - Ubuntu base -> System components.
    - Fix Ubuntu Pro item not being a parent group of its corresponding
      packages.
    - Fix incorrect available version for Ubuntu Pro updates in unattached case
      (LP: #2043425).

 -- Nathan Pratta Teodosio <email address hidden> Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:39:36 +0100

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,

Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:16.04.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: Fix Released → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
removed: verification-done verification-done-xenial
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (update-manager/1:16.04.21)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted update-manager (1:16.04.21) for xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

update-notifier/blacklisted (arm64, armhf, ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#update-manager

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) wrote :

In a Xenial virtual machine with Pro unattached, installed version .21 of update-manager from proposed, opened update-manager and verified that Nginx in the Pro section still shows

  Available version: 1.10.3-0ubuntu0.16.04.5+esm5

tags: added: verification-done verification-done-xenial
removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.